Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Rivera v. WMC Mortgage Corp.

April 26, 2010

ROSA RIVERA, PLAINTIFF,
v.
WMC MORTGAGE CORP. ET AL., DEFENDANTS.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Dean D. Pregerson United States District Judge

Order Granting Defendant Litton Loan Servicing's Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 4)

[Motion filed on March 26, 2010]

Presently before the Court is Defendant Litton Loan Servicing's Motion to Dismiss(Dkt. No. 4.) Because Plaintiff has not filed an opposition, the Court GRANTS the Motion.

Central District of California Local Rule 7-9 requires an opposing party to file an opposition to any motion at least twenty-one (21) days prior to the date designated for hearing the motion. C.D. CAL. L.R. 7-9. Additionally, Local Rule 7-12 provides that "[t]he failure to file any required paper, or the failure to file it within the deadline, may be deemed consent to the granting or denial of the motion." C.D. CAL. L.R. 7-12.

The hearing on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss was scheduled for April 26, 2010. Plaintiff's opposition was therefore due by April 5, 2010. As of the date of this Order, Plaintiff has not filed an opposition, or any other papers that could be construed as a request to move the hearing date. Accordingly, the Court deems Plaintiff's failure to oppose consent to granting Defendant's Motion to Dismiss.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20100426

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.