Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States v. Barraza

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


April 27, 2010

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF,
v.
PANCHO RAMIREZ BARRAZA, DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge: Hon. William B. Shubb

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE

Date: April 26, 2010

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED between the parties, Michael Anderson, Assistant United States Attorney, and Douglas J. Beevers, Assistant Federal Defender, attorney for defendant PANCHO RAMIREZ BARRAZA, that the status conference of April 26, 2010 at 8:30 a.m., be vacated, and the matter be set for status conference on May 3, 2010 at 8:30 a.m.

The reason for the continuance is to allow the parties additional time to negotiate a resolution. The parties agree a continuance is necessary for this purpose, and agree to exclude time under the Speedy Trial Act accordingly.

IT IS STIPULATED that the period from the signing of this Order, up to and including May 3, 2010, be excluded in computing the time within which trial must commence under the Speedy Trial Act, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv) and Local Code T4, for ongoing preparation of counsel.

Dated: April 23, 2010

ORDER

UPON GOOD CAUSE SHOWN and the stipulation of all parties, it is ordered that the status conference presently set for April 26, 2010, be continued to May 3, 2010 at 8:30 a.m. Based on the representation of defense counsel and good cause appearing therefrom, the Court hereby finds that the failure to grant a continuance in this case would deny defendant reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. The Court finds that the ends of justice to be served by granting a continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. It is ordered that time from the date of this Order, to and including, the May 3, 2010 status conference shall be excluded from computation of time within which the trial of this matter must be commenced under the Speedy Trial Act pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv) and Local Code T-4, to allow defense counsel time to prepare.

20100427

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.