Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

City of Fresno v. United States

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


April 27, 2010

CITY OF FRESNO
V. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ET AL.,

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Oliver W. Wanger United States District Judge

Defendants United States of America, United States Army Corps of Engineers, and National Guard Bureau (collectively, "United States") filed a Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings or for Partial Summary Judgment as to Plaintiff's Claim Under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act ("RCRA") (Doc. 142), as well as a Motion for Partial Judgment on the Pleadings as to Plaintiff's Claim Under the California Hazardous Substance Account Act ("HSAA") (Doc. 143.) The motions came on for hearing on March 22, 2010. All parties were represented by counsel at the hearing.

Order re: United States' Dispositive Motions Regarding Plaintiff's RCRA and HSAA Claims

After considering all papers filed in connection with the United States' motions and hearing oral argument, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED as follows:

1. The United States' motion for partial summary judgment on Plaintiff's RCRA claim (Doc. 142) is GRANTED for the reasons set forth in this Court's Memorandum Decision dated April 22, 2010 (Doc. 228), which is incorporated herein by reference. Plaintiff's claim against the United States under RCRA, as alleged in the Fourth Claim for Relief of the Second Amended Complaint, is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

2. The United States' motion for partial judgment on the pleadings on Plaintiff's HSAA claim (Doc. 143) is GRANTED for the reasons set forth in this Court's Memorandum Decision dated April 22, 2010 (Doc. 228), which is incorporated herein by reference. Plaintiff's claim against the United States under HSAA, as alleged in the Third Claim for Relief of the Second Amended Complaint, is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20100427

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.