Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Karr v. Sisto

April 30, 2010

RICHARD E. KARR, PETITIONER,
v.
D.K. SISTO, RESPONDENT.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Robert S. Lasnik Chief United States District Judge

ORDER OF REFERENCE

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a habeas petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The Ninth Circuit recently issued a decision in Hayward v. Marshall, No. 06-55392 (April 22, 2010), which calls into question the existence of a federally-protected liberty interest. The Court hereby re-refers this matter to the Honorable John L. Weinberg, United States Magistrate Judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Local Rule MJR 4, and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) for any further proceedings he deems necessary. Any appeal from the determinations of the Magistrate Judge shall be in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2).

20100430

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.