The opinion of the court was delivered by: Honorable Stephen V. Wilson
Assigned to the Hon. Stephen V. Wilson
Pursuant to the Court's Order of March 4, 2010, granting the Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Stephen C. and Ismaela C. Hughes' ("Plaintiffs") First Amended Complaint against Defendant Bank of America, N.A. (individually and as successor in interest to Countrywide Bank, FSB) ("BANA"), and dismissing the action without prejudice,
IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that all claims against BANA in Plaintiffs' Complaint are DISMISSED.
SUCH JUDGMENT IS ENTERED.
Respectfully Submitted, BRYAN CAVE LLP Vanessa A. Sunshine Attorneys for Defendants BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. (individually and as successor in interest to COUNTRYWIDE BANK, FSB)
I am employed in the County of Los Angeles, State of California. I am over the age of 18 and not a party to the within action. My business address is 120 Broadway, Suite 300, Santa Monica, California 90401.
On April 30, 2010, I served the foregoing document, described as [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL, on each interested party in this action, as follows:
(VIA ELECTRONIC SERVICE): The document was served via The United States District Court --Central District's CM/ECF electronic transfer system which generates a Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) upon the parties, the assigned judge and any registered user in the case. Each transmission was reported as complete and without error.
Plaintiffs Stephen and Ismaela Hughes 9342 Candlewood Dr. Huntington Beach, CA 92646
Plaintiffs Stephen and Ismaela Hughes 12377 Paseo Alegre Drive El Paso, Texas 79928
(BY MAIL): I placed a true copy of the foregoing document in a sealed envelope addressed to each interested party as set forth above. I placed each such envelope, with postage thereon fully prepaid, for collection and mailing at Bryan Cave LLP, Santa Monica, California. I am readily familiar with Bryan Cave LLP's practice for collection and processing of correspondence for mailing with the United States Postal Service. Under that practice, the ...