IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 5, 2010
IGNACIO SOTO HINOJOSA, PETITIONER,
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, RESPONDENT.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Oliver W. Wanger United States District Judge
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER DENYING PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
By Memorandum Decision and Order filed on April 7, 2010, Petitioner's motion to vacate, set aside or correct sentence was denied. Judgment for Respondent was entered on April 7, 2010.
On April 19, 2010, Petitioner filed a "request extra [sic] time to file petitioner's response to clerk memorandum of denial" of his Section 2255 motion. Petitioner relies on Rule 27, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.
Petitioner's request is DENIED. Rule 27 has no application to proceedings in the District Courts. Further, Petitioner's Section 2255 motion was denied on the merits without an ordered response from Respondent pursuant to Rule 4, Rules Governing Section 2255 Proceedings for the United States District Courts.
Because no response from Respondent was ordered, Petitioner is not entitled to file any reply brief.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.