Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Orr v. Hernandez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


May 5, 2010

FRANK ORR, PLAINTIFF,
v.
ADRIANA HERNANDEZ, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Justin L. Quackenbush Senior United States District Judge

ORDER ON MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND

On May 3, 2010, Plaintiff filed a Second Amended Complaint. Attached as Exhibit A, was a Motion for Leave to File an Amended Complaint. Ct. Rec. 35. All motions and related filings must be filed as separate documents (not as exhibits) to ensure all parties and the court are notified of the motion. The court will construe Ct. Rec. 35 as a Motion for Leave to File an Amended Complaint, with the main document, the Second Amended Complaint, as the proposed amendment. As the deadline for amending the pleadings has been set at May 26, 2010, the court expedites the briefing schedule and the date the motion will be submitted. Defendants shall respond to the Motion To Amend (per L.R. 72-230(l)) on or before May 19, 2010. If a response is filed, Plaintiff may file a reply no later than May 31, 2010. This matter will be deemed submitted when the reply is filed, or May 31, 2010, whichever comes first.

The Clerk shall file this Order and forward copies to Mr. Orr and to counsel for the Defendants.

20100505

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.