Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Lopez v. Bank of America

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


May 7, 2010

ALBERT LOPEZ, AS AN INDIVIDUAL AND RENE POMPA, AS AN INDIVIDUAL, BOTH ON BEHALF OF OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, PLAINTIFF,
v.
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., A NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AND DOES 1 THROUGH 100, INCLUSIVE, DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Honorable James Larson United States Magistrate Judge

(Assigned to the Hon. James Larson, Ctrm. F)

[PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING LABOR CODE § 226.7 CLAIM FOR REST BREAK VIOLATIONS WITHOUT PREJUDICE AND GRANTING LEAVE TO AMEND

[PROPOSED] ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the Stipulation To Dismiss Labor Code § 226.7 Claim For Rest Break Violations Without Prejudice And For Leave To Amend ("Stipulation"). The Court, having considered the Stipulation, now finds that the Stipulation should be granted.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED as follows:

1. Plaintiffs Albert Lopez's and Renee Pompa's ("Plaintiffs") Labor Code § 226.7 Claim For Rest Break Violations is hereby dismissed without prejudice. No notice shall be sent to the putative class of this dismissal.

2. Plaintiffs and Defendants Bank of America, N.A., Bank of America Corporation, and Banc of America Investment Services, Inc.'s ("Defendants") shall bear their own costs and attorneys' fees in connection with the dismissal of the Labor Code § 226.7 Claim For Rest Break Violations.

3. Plaintiffs are granted leave to file the Third Amended Complaint, attached as Exhibit A to the Stipulation, which shall be filed and served within five (5) days after this Order.

4. The Answer of Defendant Bank of America, N.A. to Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint, filed in the Superior Court for the County of Alameda on March 19, 2008, and made a part of this Court's record through Defendant Bank of America Corporation's Notice of Removal, filed on March 23, 2010, shall be deemed to be the Answer of Defendants to Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint, and it will not be necessary for Defendants to file an Answer to the Third Amended Complaint.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20100507

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.