Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States v. Ramirez-Rosales

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


May 7, 2010

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF,
v.
CESAR RAMIREZ-ROSALES, DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge William B. Shubb

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE; EXCLUDING TIME

Date: May 10, 2010

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED between the parties, Michael Anderson, Assistant United States Attorney, and Douglas J. Beevers, Assistant Federal Defender, attorney for defendant CESAR RAMIREZ-ROSALES, that the status conference of May 10, 2010 be vacated, and the matter be set for status conference on June 7, 2010 at 8:30 a.m.

The reason for the continuance is the Government has recently made a plea agreement available to the defendant. Additional time is needed for defense counsel to review the plea agreement with the defendant. The parties agree a continuance is necessary for this purpose, and agree to exclude time under the Speedy Trial Act accordingly.

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED and agreed between the parties that the period from the signing of this Order, up to and including June 7, 2010 be excluded in computing the time within which trial must commence under the Speedy Trial Act, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv) and Local Code T4, for ongoing preparation of counsel.

Dated: May 7, 2010

Respectfully submitted,

DANIEL J. BRODERICK Federal Defender

DOUGLAS BEEVERS Assistant Federal Defender Attorney for Defendant CESAR RAMIREZ-ROSALES

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney

MICHAEL ANDERSON Assistant U.S. Attorney

ORDER

UPON GOOD CAUSE SHOWN and the stipulation of all parties, it is ordered that the status conference presently set for May 10, 2010 be continued to Monday, June 7, 2010 at 8:30am. Based on the representation of defense counsel and good cause appearing therefrom, the Court hereby finds that the failure to grant a continuance in this case would deny defendant reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. The Court finds that the ends of justice to be served by granting a continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. It is ordered that time from the date of this Order, to and including June 7, 2010, shall be excluded from computation of time within which the trial of this matter must be commenced under the Speedy Trial Act pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv) and Local Code T-4, to allow defense counsel time to prepare.

20100507

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.