IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 7, 2010
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA PLAINTIFF,
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Hon. Garland Burrell
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
DATE: April 23, 2010
Defendant It is hereby stipulated and agreed to between the United States of America through Michael Anderson, Assistant U.S. Attorney, and the defendant, MIGUEL ANGUIANO by and through his counsel, PREETI K. BAJWA, Attorney at Law, that the status conference set for Friday April 23, 2010 be continued to Friday May 21, 2010 at 9:00 a.m.
The reason for this continuance is to allow defense counsel additional time to review discovery with the defendant, to examine possible defenses and to continue investigating the facts of the case.
Accordingly, the parties believe that the continuance should be excluded from the calculation of time under the Speedy Trial Act. The additional time is necessary to ensure effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv); Local Code T4. The interests of justice served by granting this continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A).
DATED: April 22, 2010
PREETI K. BAJWA Attorney for Defendant MIGUEL ANGUIANO
BENJAMIN WAGNER United States Attorney MICHAEL ANDERSON Assistant U.S. Attorney Attorney for Plaintiff
IT IS SO ORDERED. Time is excluded from today's date through and including May 21, 2010 in the interests of justice pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv) [reasonable time to prepare] and Local Code T4.
© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.