Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Taylor v. Donley

May 10, 2010

KAREN M. TAYLOR, PLAINTIFF,
v.
MICHAEL B. DONLEY, SECRETARY OF THE UNITED STATES AIR FORCE, DEFENDANT.



STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) ORDER READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTAINS IMPORTANT DATES WHICH THE COURT WILL STRICTLY ENFORCE AND WITH WHICH ALL COUNSEL AND PARTIES MUST COMPLY. A FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE TERMS OF THIS ORDER MAY RESULT IN THE IMPOSITION OF MONETARY AND ALL OTHER SANCTIONS WITHIN THE POWER OF THE COURT, INCLUDING DISMISSAL OR AN ORDER OF JUDGMENT.

Pursuant to court order, a Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference was held on May 7, 2010, at 11:00 a.m. Plaintiff Karen M. Taylor, who is proceeding pro se in this action, appeared on her own behalf. Todd A. Pickles, Esq. appeared as counsel for defendant Michael B. Donley, Secretary of the Air Force.

After hearing, the court makes the following findings and orders: SERVICE OF PROCESS Plaintiff has effected service of process on the defendant named in her Second Amended Complaint filed March 4, 2009 (Doc. No. 31). No further service of process is permitted except with leave of court, good cause having been shown.

JOINDER OF PARTIES/AMENDMENTS

No further joinder of parties or amendments to pleadings is permitted except with leave of court, good cause having been shown. See Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc., 975 F.2d 604, 609-10 (9th Cir. 1992).

JURISDICTION/VENUE Jurisdiction over this action is predicated upon Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and § 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. Jurisdiction is disputed by defendant to the extent that plaintiff failed to administratively exhaust any claim set forth in her Second Amended Complaint. Venue is undisputed and is hereby found to be proper.

MOTION HEARING SCHEDULES

All law and motion, except as to discovery, which is discussed below in a separate section, shall be conducted so as to be completed by March 4, 2011. The word "completed" in this context means that all law and motion matters must be heard on or before the above date. Because this date is not necessarily a date that will be set aside for law and motion hearings, counsel and parties proceeding pro se are required to contact this court's courtroom deputy, Pete Buzo, at (916) 930-4128 sufficiently in advance to ascertain dates on which non-discovery motions may be heard prior to the law and motion deadline and to properly notice such motions for hearing on or before the deadline. This paragraph does not preclude the filing of motions for continuances, motions for temporary restraining orders, and other emergency applications that are subject to special scheduling.

The parties shall refer to Local Rule 230 regarding the requirements for noticing a non-discovery motion on the magistrate judge's regularly scheduled law and motion calendar. Counsel and parties proceeding pro se shall file and serve opposition OR a statement of non-opposition to all properly noticed motions not later than fourteen (14) days preceding the hearing date. Any reply shall be filed and served not later than seven (7) days preceding the hearing date.

The parties should keep in mind that the purpose of law and motion is to narrow and refine the legal issues raised by the case, and to dispose of by pretrial motion the issues that are susceptible to resolution without trial. To accomplish that purpose, the parties must identify and fully research the issues presented by the case and then examine those issues in light of the evidence gleaned through discovery. If it appears to counsel or a party proceeding pro se after examining the legal issues and the facts that an issue can be resolved by pretrial motion, counsel or the pro se party shall file an appropriate motion within the time set forth above.

ALL PURELY LEGAL ISSUES ARE TO BE RESOLVED BY TIMELY PRETRIAL MOTION

Counsel and parties proceeding pro se are advised that motions in limine are procedural devices designed to address the admissibility of evidence. The court will look with disfavor upon substantive motions presented in the guise of motions in limine at the time of trial. Counsel and parties proceeding pro se are cautioned that if any legal issue that should have been tendered to the court by pretrial motion must be resolved by the court after the law and motion deadline, substantial sanctions may be levied against the attorney or the party proceeding pro se who failed to timely file an appropriate motion.

DISCOVERY

All discovery shall be conducted so as to be completed by January 14, 2011. The word "completed" in this context means that all discovery shall have been conducted so that all depositions have been taken and any disputes relative to discovery shall have been resolved by appropriate order if necessary and, where discovery has been ordered, the order has been complied with. All discovery motions must be noticed on the magistrate judge's calendar in accordance with Local Rule 251.

The initial disclosure requirement of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(1) is waived as to all parties in this action. Defendant's request for leave to serve more than 25 written interrogatories is granted. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 33(a)(1). Either party may serve up to 30 written interrogatories. A request for the name and address of witnesses with knowledge of a particular fact, the identification of documents ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.