Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States v. Etebom

May 11, 2010

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
v.
MBARIKET, RICHARD ETEBOM SOCIAL SECURITY NO. 1 3 8 4 (LAST 4 DIGITS)



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Christina A. Snyder, U.S. District Judge

JUDGMENT AND PROBATION/COMMITMENT ORDER

MONTH DAY YEAR

In the presence of the attorney for the government, the defendant appeared in person on this date. 05 07 2010

X WITH COUNSEL Raul Ayala (Deputy Federal Public Defender)

(Name of Counsel)

X GUILTY, and the court being satisfied that there is a factual basis for the plea. NOLO

CONTENDERE NOT

GUILTY

There being a finding/verdict of GUILTY, defendant has been convicted as charged of the offense(s) of:

18 U.S.C. §2320(a): Trafficking in Counterfeit Goods (Count 4 of the Indictment), Class C Felony The Court asked whether there was any reason why judgment should not be pronounced. Because no sufficient cause to the contrary was shown, or appeared to the Court, the Court adjudged the defendant guilty as charged and convicted and ordered that: Pursuant to the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984, it is the judgment of the Court that the defendant is hereby placed on PROBATION for a period of three (3) years under the following terms and conditions:

The defendant shall comply with the rules and regulations of the U. S. Probation Office and General Order 318;

The defendant shall participate for a period of 16 months in a home detention program which may include electronic monitoring, GPS, or voice recognition and shall observe all rules of such program, as directed by the Probation Officer. The defendant shall maintain a residential telephone line without devices and/or services that may interrupt operation of the monitoring equipment;

So long as the defendant remains unemployed, the defendant shall be relieved from paying the costs of home confinement monitoring. However, once the defendant is employed, the defendant shall pay the costs of home monitoring to the contract vendor, not to exceed the sum of $12.00 for each day of participation in the electronic monitoring, GPS, and/or voice recognition program. The defendant shall provide payment and proof of payments as directed by the Probation Officer. The Court sets NOVEMBER 8, 2010 at 1:30 P.M., for the purposes of reviewing whether home monitoring shall be terminated or the terms and conditions imposed today should be modified in some fashion;

During the period of community supervision the defendant shall pay the special assessment and fine in accordance with this judgment's orders pertaining to such payment;

The defendant shall own, operate or maintain only those web sites which have been disclosed to the Probation Officer upon commencement of supervision;

The defendant shall not engage, as whole or partial owner, employee or otherwise, in any business involving the sale of products through the use of web site advertising, or over the internet, without the express approval of the Probation Officer prior to engagement in such employment. Further, the defendant shall provide the Probation Officer with access to any and all business records, supplier lists and other records pertaining to the operation of such business owned, in whole or in part, by the defendant, as directed by the Probation Officer;

When not employed or excused by the Probation Officer for schooling, training, or other acceptable reasons, the defendant shall perform 20 hours of community service per week as directed by the Probation Officer; and

The defendant shall cooperate in the collection of a DNA sample from the defendant.

The drug testing condition mandated by statute is suspended based on the Court's determination that the defendant poses a low risk of future substance abuse.

It is ordered that the defendant shall pay to the United States a special assessment of $100, which is

The defendant shall comply with General Order No. 01-05.

It is ordered that the defendant shall pay to the United States a total fine of $3,000, which shall bear interest as provided by law.

The fine shall be due during the period of imprisonment, at the rate of not less than $25 per quarter, and pursuant to the Bureau of Prisons' Inmate Financial Responsibility Program. If any amount of the fine remains unpaid after release from custody, monthly installments of $125 shall be made during the period of ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.