UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 11, 2010
NICOLAS DAVID ANDREAS, PLAINTIFF,
JAMES YATES, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Sandra M. Snyder United States Magistrate Judge
ORDER STRIKING PLAINTFF'S SUPPLEMENT TO SUR-REPLY TO MOTION TO DISMISS
Plaintiff Nicolas David Andreas, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on September 8, 2008.
Neither the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure nor the Local Rules provides for a sur-reply to a moving party's reply in a motion to dismiss, absent an order from the court requiring one. Fed. R. Civ. P. 12. In this case, the Court did not order a sur-reply in opposition to Defendants' reply such that Plaintiff's sur-reply to Defendants' reply, filed May 3, 2010, was ordered stricken from the record.
Accordingly, Plaintiff's supplement to his sur-reply in support of his opposition to Defendants' motion to dismiss, filed May 7, 2010, is HEREBY ORDERED STRICKEN from the record.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.