UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 12, 2010
MARK STAMAS AND JUDY CASTLES, PLAINTIFFS,
COUNTY OF MADERA; BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF MADERA; DAVID HERMAN, AN INDIVIDUAL; SHAWN HUSTON, AN INDIVIDUAL; DAVID PRENTICE, AN INDIVIDUAL; GERALD HOUSTON AND LINDA BARLOW, HUSBAND AND WIFE; AND DOES 1-100, INCLUSIVE, DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Sheila K. Oberto United States Magistrate Judge
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT AND ORDER COMPLAINT FILED: May 27, 2009
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto, through their respective attorneys of record, that due to the complexity of the Third Amended Complaint filed in this matter, the time for Defendants, COUNTY OF MADERA and BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF MADERA to respond be continued 7 days, to and Including May 19, 2010.
DATED: May 11, 2010
On the stipulation and agreement of the parties through their attorneys of record and good cause appearing therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the time for Defendants, COUNTY OF MADERA and BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF MADERA to respond be continued 7 days, to and including May 19, 2010.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.