Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Stamas v. County of Madera

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


May 12, 2010

MARK STAMAS AND JUDY CASTLES, PLAINTIFFS,
v.
COUNTY OF MADERA; BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF MADERA; DAVID HERMAN, AN INDIVIDUAL; SHAWN HUSTON, AN INDIVIDUAL; DAVID PRENTICE, AN INDIVIDUAL; GERALD HOUSTON AND LINDA BARLOW, HUSBAND AND WIFE; AND DOES 1-100, INCLUSIVE, DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Sheila K. Oberto United States Magistrate Judge

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT AND ORDER COMPLAINT FILED: May 27, 2009

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto, through their respective attorneys of record, that due to the complexity of the Third Amended Complaint filed in this matter, the time for Defendants, COUNTY OF MADERA and BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF MADERA to respond be continued 7 days, to and Including May 19, 2010.

DATED: May 11, 2010

ORDER

On the stipulation and agreement of the parties through their attorneys of record and good cause appearing therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the time for Defendants, COUNTY OF MADERA and BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF MADERA to respond be continued 7 days, to and including May 19, 2010.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20100512

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.