Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Van Noland v. Pelletier

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


May 12, 2010

MILTON CHARLES VAN NOLAND AND JOY GARNER, PLAINTIFFS,
v.
ERIC S. PELLETIER AND "GRRR! LIMITED," DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Morrison C. England, Jr. United States District Judge

ORDER

On February 4, 2010, the Magistrate Judge denied Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand and Plaintiffs' Motion for Recusal. On March 3, 2010, Plaintiffs filed a Motion for Reconsideration of that Order. This Court denied Plaintiffs' Motion for Reconsideration by Order filed April 6, 2010.

Plaintiffs have now filed yet another Motion in this matter, this time denominated it as a "Motion for Correction", asking that the Court "correct" its previous April 6, 2010 Order denying reconsideration.

Plaintiffs' present request is nothing more than a second Motion for Reconsideration of the Court's April 6, 2010 Order. Eastern District Local Rule 303(c), while allowing a party to seek reconsideration of a Magistrate Judge's ruling, does not authorize repeated attempts to do so ("a party seeking reconsideration of a Magistrate Judge's ruling shall file a Motion for Reconsideration"). The instant Motion (Docket No. 97) is accordingly DENIED*fn1 as both unauthorized and cumulative.*fn2

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.