Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Hare v. Sisto

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


May 17, 2010

DANNY CHARLES HARE, PETITIONER,
v.
D.K. SISTO, ET AL., RESPONDENTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Kendall J. Newman United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner challenges the 2007 decision by the California Board of Parole Hearings finding him unsuitable for parole. On April 5, 2007, petitioner filed a notice of change of address indicating that he is no longer incarcerated. Because petitioner appears to have been released on parole, he is ordered to show cause why this action should not be dismissed as moot.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within fourteen days of the date of this order, petitioner shall show cause why this action should not be dismissed as moot.

20100517

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.