Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Verduzco v. Indymac Mortgage Services

May 24, 2010

ARTURO VERDUZCO AND DELILA VERDUZCO, PLAINTIFFS,
v.
INDYMAC MORTGAGE SERVICES, A DIVISION OF ONE WEST BANK FSB; MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC.; SIERRA PACIFIC MORTGAGE; WBJ, INC.; DANIEL RUPP,*FN1 DEFENDANTS.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Garland E. Burrell, Jr. United States District Judge

ORDER

Plaintiffs were provided notice under Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure on May 13, 2010 that Defendants Willma E. Sparano; IndyMac Federal Bank, FSB; BAC Home Loan Servicing, LP, a Subsidiary of Bank of America, N.A.; U.S. Bank National Association; and NDEX West, LLC would be dismissed from this action for failure to serve process within Rule 4(m)'s 120-day service period unless Plaintiffs filed by May 22, 2010 either proof of service or an explanation showing good cause why these Defendants should not be dismissed. In addition, Plaintiffs were notified on May 13, 2010 that IndyMac Bank Home Loan Servicing could be dismissed as an erroneously sued party unless Plaintiffs explained in a filing by May 22, 2010 why this Defendant should not be dismissed. Plaintiffs have not responded to the May 13, 2010 notices. Therefore, Defendants Willma ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.