IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 26, 2010
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF,
JUAN VILLA, JR., MARICELLA VILLA, AND ALEX HERNANDEZ, DEFENDANT.
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RESCHEDULING STATUS CONFERENCE, AND EXCLUDING TIME UNDER THE SPEEDY TRIAL ACT
The parties stipulate that the status conference set for May 24, 2010 be continued to June 1, 2010. The parties further stipulate that the time beginning May 24, 2010, and extending through June 1, 2010, should be excluded from the calculation of time under the Speedy Trial Act. The parties submit that the ends of justice are served by the Court excluding such time, so that counsel for each defendant may have reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv); Local Code T4.
Therefore, the parties have agreed and respectfully request that the Court reschedule the status conference for June 1, 2010 at 8:30 a.m. Accordingly, the parties stipulate that time be excluded pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(iv), Local Code T4.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
DATED: May 21, 2010
For the reasons stated above, the status conference in case number CR S-07-0515-WBS, currently set for May 24, 2010, is continued to June 1, 2010; and the time beginning May 24, 2010, and extending through June 1, 2010, is excluded from the calculation of time under the Speedy Trial Act for effective defense preparation. The Court finds that interests of justice served by granting this continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.