Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Clark v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage

May 26, 2010

STEPHEN R. CLARK AND JANET CLARK, PLAINTIFFS,
v.
WELLS FARGO HOME MORTGAGE, A DIVISION OF WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., ET AL., DEFENDANTS.



ORDER

Plaintiffs, proceeding pro se, have filed a notice of dismissal of this action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a).

Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. removed this action from state court on April 7, 2010, and has filed a motion to dismiss that is on the court's calendar for hearing before the undersigned on June 4, 2010. This court's docket and the state court record provided by the removing defendant do not reflect that any defendant has filed an answer or a motion for summary judgment. Accordingly, plaintiffs may dismiss their case by notice pursuant to Rule 41(a). However, the plaintiffs are proceeding pro se, and neither can represent the other. See Local Rule 183(a). Any notice of dismissal of the entire action must therefore be signed by both of the pro se plaintiffs.

IT IS ORDERED that the notice of dismissal filed by plaintiff Stephen R. Clark on May 24, 2010 (Doc. No. 11) will be disregarded. Upon the filing of an amended notice of dismissal signed by both plaintiffs, the action will be dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a) and the case will be closed.

20100526

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.