The opinion of the court was delivered by: Craig M. Kellison United States Magistrate Judge
Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the court is plaintiff's complaint (Doc. 1).
The court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if it: (1) is frivolous or malicious; (2) fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted; or (3) seeks monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1), (2). Moreover, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure require that complaints contain a ". . . short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief." Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a)(2). This means that claims must be stated simply, concisely, and directly. See McHenry v. Renne, 84 F.3d 1172, 1177 (9th Cir. 1996) (referring to Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(e)(1)). These rules are satisfied if the complaint gives the defendant fair notice of the plaintiff's claim and the grounds upon which it rests. See Kimes v. Stone, 84 F.3d 1121, 1129 (9th Cir. 1996). Because plaintiff must allege with at least some degree of particularity overt acts by specific defendants which support the claims, vague and conclusory allegations fail to satisfy this standard. Additionally, it is impossible for the court to conduct the screening required by law when the allegations are vague and conclusory.
I. PLAINTIFF'S ALLEGATIONS
Plaintiff names the following as defendant: Wohlers, "a Teacher in CAI LAB on A-Yard." Plaintiff claims:
On 10-27-09 my teacher on A-Yard (A. Wohlers) was unjust when she singled me out of the class of about 20 students and started calling me racial slurs such as nigger and dirty spick. I filed a 602 inmate appeal on this issue which was falsely denied. My teacher (A. Wohlers) constantly wrote bogus CDC 115's on me for actions that I had not even done. I am attaching said 602 as #(1) Exhibit A. Then on a separate date I filed a second 602 inmate appeal on (A. Wohlers) and the date of that appeal was 1-14-2010. I again was at my assigned job position which is CAI Lab. And on my lunch break I was having a personal discussion with another of my class mates and happened to cuss a couple of times. Well my teacher (A. Wohlers) told me twice that she was giving me a direct order to go and sit with my nose in the corner, which is corporal punishment. And that is a violation of both State and Federal law!!
Due to her (A. Wohlers) actions and racial slurs towards me I have been under extreme stress, worry and have had some medical problems such as increased heart rate and weight loss.
The second 602 inmate appeal was also falsely denied and that was on January 26, 2010, at the first level my an appeals coordinator who never gave their name. I am attaching the second 602 as Exhibit (B).
At best, plaintiff's complaint suggests claims based on theories of retaliation and verbal harassment.
The treatment a prisoner receives in prison and the conditions under which the prisoner is confined are subject to scrutiny under the Eighth Amendment, which prohibits cruel and unusual punishment. See Helling v. McKinney, 509 U.S. 25, 31 (1993); Farmer v. Brennan, 511 U.S. 825, 832 (1994). The Eighth Amendment ". . . embodies broad and idealistic concepts of dignity, civilized standards, humanity, and decency." Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97, 102 (1976). Conditions of confinement may, however, be harsh and restrictive. See Rhodes v. Chapman, 452 U.S. 337, 347 (1981). Nonetheless, prison officials must provide prisoners with "food, clothing, shelter, sanitation, medical care, and personal safety." Toussaint v. McCarthy, 801 F.2d 1080, 1107 (9th Cir. 1986). A prison official violates the Eighth Amendment only when two requirements are met: (1) objectively, the official's act or omission must be so serious such that it results in the denial of the minimal civilized measure of life's necessities; and (2) subjectively, the prison official must have acted unnecessarily and wantonly for the purpose of inflicting harm. See Farmer, 511 U.S. at 834. Thus, to violate the Eighth Amendment, a prison official must have a "sufficiently culpable mind." See id. Allegations of verbal harassment do not state a claim under the Eighth Amendment unless it is alleged that the harassment was "calculated to . . . cause [the prisoner] psychological damage." Oltarzewski v. Ruggiero, 830 F.2d 136, 139 (9th Cir. 1987); see also Keenan v. Hall, 83 F.3d 1083, 1092 (9th Cir. 1996), amended by 135 F.3d 1318 (9th Cir. 1998).
Here, plaintiff has not stated a claim for harassment because he does not allege that defendant's conduct was calculated ...