IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION
June 1, 2010
DENO MILANO, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, PLAINTIFFS,
INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEM OF AMERICA, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION, AND INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEM INTERNATIONAL, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION, DEFENDANTS.
STIPULATION RE EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER (OR FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING) TO COMPLAINT (Civil L.R. 6-1)
Plaintiff Deno Milano and Defendants Interstate Battery System of America, Inc. and Interstate Battery System International, Inc. (collectively Defendants, together with the Plaintiff, the Parties ) by and through their undersigned attorneys hereby agree and stipulate as follows:
WHEREAS, the Complaint in the above-entitled action was filed with the above-entitled court on May 15, 2010; and served upon defendants on May 19, 2010;
WHEREAS, Defendants answer (or other responsive pleading) to the complaint is currently due on June 9, 2010;
WHEREAS, the Parties have agreed to extend the period within which the answer (or other responsive pleading) is due by thirty (30) days, through and including July 9, 2010;
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the undersigned attorneys for the parties, subject to the Court s approval that:
The Answer (or other responsive pleading) to the Complaint on file in this action shall be due on July 9, 2010.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
Dated: May 28, 2010
K & L GATES LLP Matthew G. Ball firstname.lastname@example.org Mikal J. Condon Attorneys for Defendants INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEM OF AMERICA, INC., and INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEM INTERNATIONAL, INC.
GIRARD GIBBS LLP Eric H. Gibbs Philip B. Obbard email@example.com David Stein Attorneys for Plaintiff DENO MILANO
IT SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.