UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
June 1, 2010
CLARENCE E. HOWARD, PLAINTIFF,
W. J. SULLIVAN, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Gary S. Austin United States Magistrate Judge
ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE OPPOSITION OR STATEMENT OF NON OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT KAMEL'S MOTION TO DISMISS WITHIN THIRTY DAYS (Doc. 40.)
On May 5, 2010, defendant Kamel ("Defendant") filed a motion to dismiss. (Doc. 40.) Plaintiff was required to file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to the motion within twenty-one days, but has not done so. Local Rule 230(l).
Accordingly, within thirty (30) days from the date of service of this order, Plaintiff must file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to Defendant's motion to dismiss. If Plaintiff fails to comply with this order, this action will be dismissed, with prejudice, for failure to obey the Court's order and failure to prosecute.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.