IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
June 4, 2010
PAUL LEWIS, PETITIONER,
MATTHEW CATE, RESPONDENT.
Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On April 9, 2010, petitioner filed a motion for discovery, requesting "all miscellaneous documents photocopied from Respondent., from around the time Respondent filing His or (her), answer." Petitioner also references the "state court record" in the title of his motion. Respondent filed a response to petitioner's motion on April 28, 2010. Therein, respondent construes petitioner's motion as a request for the state court record, which apparently had not been provided to petitioner as of the date of his discovery motion. (Resp't's Apr. 28, 2010 Response at 1.) Therein, respondent states that he does not oppose petitioner's request insofar as he is requesting a copy of the state court record. In a declaration filed with the court on April 29, 2010, respondent's counsel represents that he sent twelve categories of documents from the state court record to petitioner on that same date. Petitioner has not filed a reply.
In light of the foregoing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner's April 9, 2010 discovery motion seeking a copy of the state court record is granted.
© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.