Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Harris v. Vector Marketing Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


June 8, 2010

ALICIA HARRIS, AS AN INDIVIDUAL AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, PLAINTIFFS,
v.
VECTOR MARKETING CORPORATION, A PENNSYLVANIA CORPORATION; AND DOES 1 THROUGH 20, INCLUSIVE, DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Honorable Edward M. Chen United States District Court Magistrate Judge

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE DEFENDANT'S RESPONSIVE PLEADING TO PLAINTIFF'S THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT

Plaintiff Alicia Harris ("plaintiff" or "Harris") and Defendant Vector Marketing Corporation ("defendant" or "Vector") enter into this joint stipulation with reference to the following facts:

RECITALS

A. On or about May 27, 2010, plaintiff filed and served her Third Amended Complaint ("TAC").

B. Vector's time to respond to the TAC, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 6(d) and 15(a)(3), is currently set for June 14, 2010, but counsel for Vector is unavailable to file a responsive pleading on or before June 14, 2010.

NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby stipulated by the parties, through their respective counsel of record, as follows:

1. Vector may have a one week extension, up to and including, June 21, rme fo p i rsh 14 2010, to file a responsive pleading to plaintiff's TAC.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

Based on the above stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED.

20100608

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.