Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States v. Preciado

June 8, 2010

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
v.
KARLA PRECIADO SOCIAL SECURITY NO. 2007 KARLA VENEGAS (LAST 4 DIGITS)



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Honorable VIRGINIA A. Phillips United States District Judge

JUDGMENT AND PROBATION/COMMITMENT ORDER

MONTH DAY YEAR

In the presence of the attorney for the government, the defendant appeared in person on this date.

06/07/2010

W WITH COUNSEL JOSEF GEORGE MAGYAR, Retained

(Name of Counsel)

W GUILTY, and the court being satisfied that there is a factual basis for the plea.

NOLO CONTENDERE NOT GUILTY

There being a finding/verdict of GUILTY, defendant has been convicted as charged of the offense(s) of: Conspiracy to Make False Statements in Violation of 8 U.S.C. § 371 as Charged in Count One of the Indictment.

The Court asked whether there was any reason why judgment should not be pronounced. Because no sufficient cause to the contrary was shown, or appeared to the Court, the Court adjudged the defendant guilty as charged and convicted and ordered that: Pursuant to the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984, it is the judgment of the Court that the defendant is hereby committed to the custody of the Bureau of Prisons to be imprisoned for a term of:

It is ordered that the defendant shall pay to the United States a special assessment of $100, which is due

Pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 5E1.2(e) of the Guidelines, all fines are waived as it is found that the defendant does not have the ability to pay a fine in addition to restitution.

Pursuant to 18 USC3663A, it is ordered that the defendant shall pay restitution in the total amount of $167,781, to victims as set forth in a separate victim list prepared by the probation office which this Court adopts and which reflects the Court's determination of the amount of restitution due to each victim. The victim list, which shall be forwarded to the fiscal section of the clerk's office, shall remain confidential to protect the privacy interests of the victims.

The defendant shall make nominal monthly payments of at least $25 during the period of probation, which shall begin 30 days after the commencement of supervision. Nominal restitution payments are ordered as the court finds that the defendant's economic circumstances do not allow for either immediate or future payment

The defendant shall be held jointly and severally liable with co-defendant, Harold Meza, for the amount of restitution ordered in this judgment. The victim's recovery is limited to the amount of its loss and the defendant's liability for restitution ceases if and when the victims receive full restitution.

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3612(f)(3)(A), interest on the restitution ordered is waived because the defendant does not have the ability to pay interest. Payments may be subject to penalties for default and delinquency pursuant

The defendant shall comply with General Order No. 01-05.

Pursuant to the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984, it is the judgment of the Court that the defendant, Karla Patricia Preciado aka Karla Venegas, is hereby placed on probation on count one of the seven-count indictment for a term of three years under the following terms and conditions:

The defendant shall comply with the rules and regulations of the U. S. Probation Office and General Order 05-02;

The defendant shall not commit any violation of local, state or federal law or ordinance;

The defendant shall participate for a period of eight months in a home detention program which may include electronic monitoring, GPS, Alcohol Monitoring Unit or automated identification systems and shall observe all rules of such program, as directed by the Probation Officer. The defendant shall maintain a residential telephone line without devices or services that may interrupt operation of the monitoring equipment;

The defendant shall pay the costs of home confinement monitoring to the contract vendor, not to exceed the sum of $12.00 for each day of participation in the electronic monitoring, GPS, or voice recognition program. The defendant shall provide ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.