Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Ortiz v. Cox

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


June 14, 2010

ROMAN ORTIZ, PLAINTIFF,
v.
COX, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

ORDER

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se. On April 16, 2010, plaintiff's February 10, 2010 complaint was dismissed as to defendants Torres, Popvits and Swarthout, and plaintiff was granted leave to amend his complaint within thirty days of the date of the order. On April 27, 2010, plaintiff filed a notice of filing an amended complaint. However, no amended complaint was filed.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff shall file an amended complaint on or before June 30, 2010. If plaintiff fails to do so, this action will proceed on his February 10, 2010 complaint solely against defendant Cox.

20100614

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.