Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Jones v. Dazo

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


June 14, 2010

JULIUS JONES, PLAINTIFF,
v.
A. DAZO, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Gregory G. Hollows United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER & FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis. On March 23, 2010, the court found plaintiff's complaint stated a colorable claim for relief against defendants Dr. A. Dazo and Dr. S. Reddy, but dismissed claims against Holloway,*fn1 Bradley, Casey, Cardeno, Butler and Kramer with leave to amend within twenty-eight days. Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint, therefore defendants Holloway, Bradley, Casey, Cardeno, Butler and Kramer should be dismissed.

If the allegations of the complaint are proven, plaintiff has a reasonable opportunity to prevail on the merits of this action against Dr. A Dazo and Dr. S Reddy.

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Service is appropriate for the following defendants: Dr. A. Dazo and Dr. S. Reddy;

2. The Clerk of the Court shall send plaintiff two USM-285 forms, one summons, an instruction sheet and a copy of the complaint filed October 23, 2009.

3. Within twenty-eight days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall complete the attached Notice of Submission of Documents and submit the following documents to the court:

a. The completed Notice of Submission of Documents;

b. One completed summons;

c. Two completed USM-285 form for each defendant listed in number 1 above; and

d. Three copies of the endorsed complaint filed October 23, 2009.

4. Plaintiff need not attempt service on defendants and need not request waiver of service. Upon receipt of the above-described documents, the court will direct the United States Marshal to serve the above-named defendants pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4 without payment of costs.

5. The Clerk of the Court assign a District Judge in this case.

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that the defendants Holloway, Bradley, Casey, Cardeno, Butler and Kramer be dismissed from this action.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Any reply to the objections shall be served and filed within fourteen days after service of the objections. The parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.