Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Demos v. United States

June 15, 2010

JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, PLAINTIFF,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.



ORDER

On June 7, 2010, plaintiff filed a document the court construes as a motion for reconsideration of the denial of plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis.

A ruling in the district court may reconsidered under either Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e) or 60(b). See Sch. Dist. Number. 1J, Multnomah County v. ACandS, Inc., 5 F.3d 1255, 1262 (9th Cir. 1993). "Reconsideration is appropriate if the district court (1) is presented with newly discovered evidence, (2) committed clear error or the initial decision was manifestly unjust, or (3) if there is an intervening change in controlling law." Id. at 1263. Plaintiff fails to point to anything suggesting reconsideration is warranted.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's June 7, 2010 motion for reconsideration (docket no. 7) is denied.

20100615

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.