Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States v. Boze

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


June 16, 2010

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF,
v.
JEREMY THOMAS BOZE, DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge Hon. Garland E. Burrell, Jr.

Date: August 3, 2010

Time: 9:00 a.m.

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING TRIAL CONFIRMATION AND JURY TRIAL DATES AND EXCLUDING TIME

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through their respective counsel, HEIKO COPPOLA, Assistant United States Attorney, attorney for Plaintiff, and LINDA C. HARTER, Chief Assistant Federal Defender, attorney for Defendant, that the Trial-Confirmation hearing date of July 16, 2010 and Jury Trial date of August 3, 2010 be vacated, and rescheduled for Trial-Confirmation hearing on November 19, 2010 at 9:00 a.m. and for Jury Trial on December 7, 2010 at 9:00 a.m.

This continuance is requested because defense counsel is retaining a new defense expert which will require a new date and time convenient for the expert. The additional period of time will be used by the parties for further preparation for trial.

Based upon the foregoing, the parties agree that the time under the Speedy Trial Act should be excluded from the date of signing of this order through and including December 7, 2010 pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3161 (h)(7)(B)(iv) [reasonable time to prepare] and Local Code T4 based upon continuity of counsel and defense preparation.

Dated: June 14, 2010

Respectfully submitted,

DANIEL J. BRODERICK Federal Public Defender LINDA C. HARTER Chief Assistant Federal Defender Attorney for Defendant JEREMEY BOZE

Dated: June 14, 2010

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney HEIKO COPPOLA Assistant U.S. Attorney Attorney for Plaintiff

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

For the reasons set forth above, the court finds that the ends of justice to be served by a continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial and therefore excludes time under the Speedy Trial Act through December 7, 2010.

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. United States District Judge

20100616

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.