Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Temple v. Guardsmark

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION)


June 17, 2010

PHILLIP TEMPLE, ON BEHALF OF HIMSELF, INDIVIDUALLY, AND ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, PLAINTIFF,
v.
GUARDSMARK, LLC, AND DOES 1 LOCATION: COURTROOM 10, 19TH FLOOR THROUGH 100, INCLUSIVE, DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge: The Honorable Susan Illston

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO FILE DEFENDANT'S OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S LETTER BRIEF

WHEREAS, on May 28, 2010, counsel for Plaintiff Phillip Temple filed Letter Brief Number [Docket No. 61] ("Letter");

WHEREAS, the Letter has caused counsel to engage in a further meet and confer in an effort to resolve the dispute without the involvement of the Court;

WHEREAS, the parties previously stipulated that the deadline for Defendant

Guardsmark, LLC ("Guardsmark") to oppose the Letter be extended until June 18, 2010 in order to allow sufficient time for the parties to discuss this matter further and for Guardsmark to respond, if necessary, to the Letter brief [Docket No. 64];

NOW THEREFORE, Plaintiff and Defendant, through their counsel of record,

HEREBY STIPULATE that the deadline for Guardsmark to file its opposition to the Letter be further extended to July 1, 2010.

I, Martin D. Bern, attest that I have obtained concurrence from Daniel H. Qualls in the filing of this Stipulation. See N.D. Cal. General Order 45 § 10(B).

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

The Honorable Susan Illston

20100617

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.