Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States v. Presiado

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


June 17, 2010

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF,
v.
RAUL PRESIADO, DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Garland E. Burrell, Jr. United States District Judge

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER; CONTINUING STATUS CONFERENCE AND EXCLUDING TIME Date: July 2, 2010 Time: 9:00 a.m.

Judge: Hon. Garland E. Burrell Jr.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through their respective counsel, MICHAEL ANDERSON, Assistant United States Attorney, attorney for Plaintiff, and CARO MARKS, attorney for RAUL PRESIADO, that the status conference hearing date of June 18, 2010 be vacated, and the matter be set for status conference on July 2, 2010 at 9:00 a.m.

The reason for this continuance is to allow both counsel additional time to receive the PSR and plea agreement, and then to review it with the defendant.

Based upon the foregoing, the parties agree that the time under the Speedy Trial Act should be excluded from the date of signing of this order through and including July 2, 2010 pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3161 (h)(7)(A)and (B)(iv)[reasonable time to prepare] and Local Code T4 based upon continuity of counsel and defense preparation.

ORDER

UPON GOOD CAUSE SHOWN and the stipulation of all parties, it is ordered that the June 18, 2010, status conference hearing be continued to July 2, 2010, at 9:00 a.m. Based on the representation of defense counsel and good cause appearing there from, the Court hereby finds that the failure to grant a continuance in this case would deny defense counsel reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. The Court finds that the ends of justice to be served by granting a continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. It is ordered that time up to and including the July 2, 2010 status conference shall be excluded from computation of time within which the trial of this matter must be commenced under the Speedy Trial Act pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv) and Local Code T-4, to allow defense counsel reasonable time to prepare.

20100617

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.