Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Campos v. City of Merced

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA FRESNO DIVISION


June 18, 2010

JOSEPH CAMPOS, PLAINTIFF,
v.
CITY OF MERCED, MERCED POLICE OFFICER JEFFREY HORN, AND DOES 1 THROUGH 50, INCLUSIVE, DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Gary S. Austin United States Magistrate Judge

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND ORDER

1. Plaintiff JOSEPH CAMPOS and defendant CITY OF MERCED (collectively the "Parties") have entered into a Settlement Agreement and General Release in this matter whereby they have resolved all claims and agreed to the dismissal of the above-captioned action with prejudice, each party to bear their own attorney's fees and costs.

2. Accordingly, the Parties jointly request the Court to dismiss this action with prejudice.

Dated: June 18, 2010 LOW, BALL & LYNCH DALE L. ALLEN, JR. DIRK D. LARSEN Attorneys for Defendants CITY OF MERCED and MERCED POLICE OFFICER JEFFREY HORN

Dated: June 18, 2010. LAW OFFICE OF ERIC P. ESCAMILLA ERIC P. ESCAMILLA Attorneys for Plaintiff JOSEPH CAMPOS

ORDER

Having considered the Parties' Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice and for good cause appearing, it is hereby ORDERED:

1. That the above-captioned action, Campos v. City of Merced et al, Case No. 1:08-CV-00001-GSA, is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, each party to bear their own costs and attorney's fees.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20100618

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.