Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

George v. California Infrastructure and Economic Development Bank

June 18, 2010

WILLIAM GEORGE, ON BEHALF OF HIMSELF AND ALL OTHER PERSONS SIMILARLY SITUATED, PLAINTIFF,
v.
CALIFORNIA INFRASTRUCTURE AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT BANK, A PUBLIC INSTRUMENTALITY OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA AND ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE, LLP, AN ENTITY, DEFENDANTS.



STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING FILING OF SECOND AMENDED CONSOLIDATED COMPLAINT AND RESPONSE THERETO WHEREAS:

1. This case, an alleged class action asserting claims under Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 filed on June 10, 2009 [Docket No. 1], is subject to the requirements of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 ("PSLRA");

2. Under the PSLRA, all discovery and other proceedings (including initial disclosures under Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 26(a)) are stayed until and unless it is determined that the plaintiff can state a claim capable of surviving a motion to dismiss (15 U.S.C. § 78u-4(b)(3); Medhekar v. U.S. District Court, 99 F.3d 325, 328 (9th Cir. 1996));

3. On September 15, 2009, the Court granted the motion of William George ("Lead Plaintiff") to be appointed lead plaintiff [Docket No. 39];

4. On December 28, 2009, Lead Plaintiff filed a First Amended Consolidated Complaint ("FACC") [Docket No. 52];

5. On February 5, 2010, Defendants jointly filed a motion to dismiss the FACC [Docket Nos. 57-62], and the Court signed a stipulation and order [Docket No. 56] pursuant to which that motion was set for hearing on April 5, 2010 at 9:00 a.m., or at such other time as is convenient for the Court;

6. On March 5, 2010, Lead Plaintiff filed his opposition to Defendants' motion to dismiss [Docket No. 66], and on March 24, 2010, Defendants jointly filed a reply brief [Docket No. 67].

7. On April 2, 2010, the Court issued a minute order [Docket No. 68] stating that Defendants' motion to dismiss was submitted without oral argument and canceling the hearing scheduled for April 5, 2010;

8. On June 10, 2010, the Court issued an Order granting Defendants' Motion to Dismiss the FACC without prejudice [Docket No. 71];

9. On June 15, 2010, the Court issued a Minute Order setting the Case Management Conference for September 20, 2010;

10. Lead Plaintiff intends to file a Second Amended Consolidated Complaint ("SACC");

11. Lead Plaintiff's SACC is currently due on June 24, 2010;

12. The parties have agreed upon a mutually acceptable schedule for the filing of the SACC and the briefing and hearing for any subsequent motion to dismiss the SACC filed by Defendants.

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and among the undersigned counsel for the parties, that:

1. Lead Plaintiff will file and serve its Second Amended Consolidated Complaint ("SACC") on ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.