UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
June 20, 2010
TONY B. ALEXANDER, PETITIONER,
SCOTT SCHLEDER, SOUTHEAST REGIONAL DHO, RESPONDENT.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Sheila K. Oberto United States Magistrate Judge
ORDER DEEMING MOTION (DOC. 16) TO BE A TRAVERSE ORDER DENYING REQUEST CONCERNING TRAVERSE (DOC. 15) AS MOOT
Petitioner is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Pursuant to the parties' consent, the matter has been referred to the Magistrate Judge for all proceedings, including the entry of final judgment, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b), and Local Rule 301.
On March 8, 2010, Petitioner filed a document (Doc. 16) entitled, "Motion Pursuant Traverse For the order concerning 28 U.S.C. section 2241 In Violation of Plaintiff Procedural Due Process and Fifth Amendment rights," in which Petitioner responded to the answer previously filed by Respondent. In order to maintain an accurate docket, the Court DEEMS Petitioner's motion to be Petitioner's traverse to Respondent's answer to the petition.
Further, Petitioner's request (Doc. 15), entitled as an emergency motion concerning Petitioner's traverse and filed on February 17, 2010, is DENIED as moot because Petitioner's traverse has been located and has been filed.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.