Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Hall v. County of Sacramento

June 22, 2010

FRANK S. HALL, PLAINTIFF,
v.
COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, SHERIFF'S DEPUTY NATE BURNETTE, DEFENDANTS.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Morrison C. England, Jr. United States District Judge

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL; ORDER

WHEREAS, defendants COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, NATE BURNETTE and plaintiff FRANK S. HALL have resolved all claims between them;

Defendants COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, NATE BURNETTE and plaintiff FRANK S. HALL hereby stipulate, through their respective undersigned counsel, that all claims against defendants COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT and NATE BURNETTE be dismissed with prejudice.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Dated: June 17, 2010

FILICE LAW OFFICES Gerald W. Filice As authorized by e-mail on 06/17/10

Gerald W. Filice Attorney for Plaintiff FRANK S. HALL

Dated: June 17, 2010

PORTER SCOTT A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION David A. Melton Attorneys for Defendants COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT and NATE BURNETTE

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED. The Clerk of Court is hereby directed to close this file.

20100622

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.