Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States v. Orozco-Hernandez

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


June 22, 2010

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF,
v.
RAYMUNDO OROZCO-HERNANDEZ, DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge: Hon. William B. Shubb

ORDER; STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED CONTINUING STATUS CONFERENCE AND EXCLUDING TIME

Date: July 12, 2010

Time: 8:30 a.m.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through their respective counsel, MICHAEL ANDERSON, Assistant United States Attorney, attorney for Plaintiff, and CARO MARKS, attorney for RAYMUNDO OROZCO-HERNANDEZ, that the status conference hearing date of June 21, 2010 be vacated, and the matter be set for status conference on July 12, 2010 at 8:30 a.m.

The reason for this continuance is to allow both counsel additional time to receive the PSR and plea agreement, and then to review it with the defendant.

Based upon the foregoing, the parties agree that the time under the Speedy Trial Act should be excluded from the date of signing of this order through and including July 12, 2010 pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3161 (h)(7)(A)and (B)(iv)[reasonable time to prepare] and Local Code T4 based upon continuity of counsel and defense preparation.

DATED: June 23, 2010.

Respectfully submitted,

DANIEL J. BRODERICK Federal Public Defender

CARO MARKS Designated Counsel for Service

Attorney for RAYMUNDO OROZCO-HERNANDEZ

DATED: June 23, 2010.

BENJAMIN WAGNER United States Attorney

Caro Marks for MICHAEL ANDERSON Assistant U.S. Attorney Attorney for Plaintiff

ORDER UPON GOOD CAUSE SHOWN and the stipulation of all parties, it is ordered that the June 21, 2010, status conference hearing be continued to July 12, 2010, at 8:30 a.m. Based on the representation of defense counsel and good cause appearing there from, the Court hereby finds that the failure to grant a continuance in this case would deny defense counsel reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. The Court finds that the ends of justice to be served by granting a continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. It is ordered that time up to and including the July 12, 2010 status conference shall be excluded from computation of time within which the trial of this matter must be commenced under the Speedy Trial Act pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv) and Local Code T-4, to allow defense counsel reasonable time to prepare.

20100622

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.