UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION
June 29, 2010
PAMFILA R. CAMANGIAN, PLAINTIFF,
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DEFENDANT.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: A. Howard Matz United States District Judge
On March 23, 2009, Pamfila Camangian ("Plaintiff") filed Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint which asserted claims for income tax refunds for tax years 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 2004 and the 2000 Tax Rebate.*fn1
On February 22, 2010, the United States of America ("Defendant"), filed its Motion for Summary Judgment.
On March 19, 2010, Plaintiff filed Plaintiff's Opposition to Motion and Motion for Summary Judgment.
On March 22, 2010, Plaintiff's attorney filed Plaintiff's Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment.
Based on the papers filed in this case, all other matters properly made part of the record, including both Plaintiff's Opposition, and that of her attorney, which fail to demonstrate a genuine issue of material fact as to whether Plaintiff is entitled to the relief she seeks in her First Amended Complaint, and for good cause appearing,
IT IS ORDERED that the United States' Motion for Summary Judgment is granted and the Amended Complaint filed by Pamfila R. Camangian is denied in full, thus resolving the Amended Complaint in favor of the United States.
IT IS SO ORDERED.