Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Baker v. Fischel

June 29, 2010

ALEXANDER COLLIN BAKER AND DOES 1-10 PLAINTIFFS,
v.
RICHARD J. FISCHEL, M.D., PH.D., RICHARD J. FISCHEL, A MEDICAL CORPORATION, GLENN H. CLARK, SCHMID AND VOILES, STEVEN C. GLICKMAN, GLICKMAN & GLICKMAN, A LAW CORPORATION, TAMI SMOLIN, AND DOES 1-10, DEFENDANTS.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: James V. Selna Judge of the United States District Court

(Hon. James V. Selna, 10C, Clerk: 714.338.2848)

Complaint filed: January 5, 2010

JUDGMENT FOLLOWING ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS ACTION FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM UPON WHICH RELIEF MAY BE GRANTED(FRCP Rule 12(b)(6))

Date: May 10, 2010 Time: 1:30 p.m.

Defendants Steven C. Glickman and Glickman & Glickman, a Law Corporation's motion to dismiss the above-captioned action for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted came on for hearing in Courtroom 10C of the above-entitled court on May 10, 2010.

Plaintiff Alexander Collin Baker appeared on his own behalf.

Byron S. Hollins, of Hollins & Levy LLP, appeared on behalf of defendants Steven C. Glickman and Glickman & Glickman, a Law Corporation.

On proof made to the satisfaction of the court that plaintiff had not and can not state any claim against defendants Steven C. Glickman and Glickman & Glickman, a Law Corporation, upon which relief may be granted, and that said defendants are therefore entitled to judgment as a matter of law,

IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that judgment is entered in favor of defendants Steven C. Glickman and Glickman & Glickman, a Law Corporation, and against plaintiff Alexander Collin Baker; defendants shall recover from plaintiff their costs in the sum of $________________.

Pursuant to Rule 54(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court finds that there is no just reason for delay in entry of this Judgment.

PROOF OF SERVICE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

I am employed in the County of Los Angeles, State of California. I am over the age of 18 years, and am not a party to the within action; my business address is Suite 100, 23801 Calabasas Road, Calabasas, California 91302.

On the date hereinbelow specified, I served the foregoing document, described as set forth below, on the interested parties in this ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.