Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Ordaz v. Tate

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA FRESNO DIVISION


June 29, 2010

RAFAEL S. ORDAZ, PLAINTIFF,
v.
HAROLD TATE, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Honorable B. Lynn Winmill Chief U. S. District Judge

ORDER

Pending before the Court are a Report and Recommendation, a Motion for Temporary Restraining Order, and two Motions for Summary Judgment. (Docket Nos. 62, 66, 69, & 72.) Plaintiff filed a notice of change of address on May 12, 2010 (Docket No. 75), but mail sent to that address has been returned by the United States Post Office as undeliverable since that date. Plaintiff has not filed an opposition to the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Harold Tate on April 12, 2010, or to the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Charles O'Brien on May 10, 2010, and the time for response has since passed. It is unclear from the record whether Plaintiff wishes to pursue this case, and whether Plaintiff's current mailing address has been provided to the Clerk of Court and the parties.

NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, no later than fourteen (14) days after entry of this Order, Plaintiff shall file a notice of current address and any oppositions to the pending Motions for Summary Judgment. Failure to do so shall result in the granting of the Motions for Summary Judgment and dismissal of this case with prejudice.

20100629

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.