Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States v. Yokom

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


June 29, 2010

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF,
v.
SHERI LYNN YOKOM, DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Garland E. Burrell, Jr. United States District Judge

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

Date: July 23, 2010 Time: 9:00 am.

Judge: Hon. Garland E. Burrell Jr.

It is hereby stipulated between the parties, Assistant United States Attorney Michael Anderson, and Assistant Federal Defender Caro Marks, attorney for defendant Sheri Lynn Yokom, as follows:

The status conference date of July 2, 2010, should be continued until July 23, 2010.

The reason for the continuance is that the defense attorney is out of town on a family emergency and is unable to attend the currently scheduled hearing.

Therefore, IT IS STIPULATED between the parties that the time period between the signing of this Order up to and including July 23, 2010 be excluded in computing the time within which trial must commence under the Speedy Trial Act, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv) and Local Code T4, for ongoing preparation and continuity of counsel.

Dated: June 29, 2010 Respectfully submitted, DANIEL J. BRODERICK Federal Defender CARO MARKS Attorney for Defendant SHERI LYNN YOKOM

Dated: June 29, 2010 BENJAMIN WAGNER United States Attorney MICHAEL ANDERSON Assistant United States Attorney

ORDER

UPON GOOD CAUSE SHOWN and the stipulation of all parties, it is ordered that the July 2, 2010 status conference be continued to July 23, 2010 at 9:00 a.m. Based on the representation of defense counsel and good cause appearing there from, the court hereby finds that the failure to grant a continuance in this case would deny defense counsel reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. The Court finds that the ends of justice to be served by granting a continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. It is ordered that time up to and including the status conference on July 23, 2010 shall be excluded from computation of time within which the trial of this matter must be commenced under the Speedy Trial Act pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv) and Local Code T-4, to allow defense counsel reasonable time to prepare.

20100629

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.