UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION)
July 1, 2010
PHILLIP TEMPLE, ON BEHALF OF HIMSELF, INDIVIDUALLY, AND ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, PLAINTIFF,
GUARDSMARK, LLC, AND DOES 1 THROUGH 100, INCLUSIVE, DEFENDANT.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge: The Honorable Susan Illston
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO FILE DEFENDANT'S OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S LETTER BRIEF
WHEREAS, on May 28, 2010, counsel for Plaintiff Phillip Temple filed Letter Brief Number 2 [Docket No. 61] ("Letter"); 3
WHEREAS, the Letter has caused counsel to engage in a further meet and confer in an effort to resolve the dispute without the involvement of the Court;
WHEREAS, the parties have stipulated that the deadline for Defendant Guardsmark, LLC ("Guardsmark") to oppose the Letter be extended until July 1, 2010 in order to allow sufficient time for the parties to discuss this matter further and for Guardsmark to respond, if necessary, to the Letter brief;
NOW THEREFORE, Plaintiff and Defendant, through their counsel of record,
HEREBY STIPULATE that the deadline for Guardsmark to file its opposition to the Letter be extended to July 8, 2010.
I, Martin D. Bern, attest that I have obtained concurrence from Daniel H. Qualls in the filing of this Stipulation. See N.D. Cal. General Order 45 § 10(B).
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
The Honorable Susan Illston
© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.