Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Tanksley v. California Dep't of Corrections

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


July 7, 2010

MOODY WOODROW TANKSLEY, PLAINTIFF,
v.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ET. AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Sidney R. Thomas, United States Circuit Judge Sitting by Designation

ORDER

This case was dismissed without prejudice due to Plaintiff's failure to keep the Court apprised of his current address, in violation of Local Rule 183(b). It has now come to the Court's attention that Plaintiff did list his updated address on a previous request for a status report filed with the Court. Thus, the judgment dismissing this case is VACATED and the case shall be re-opened for further proceedings.

The Clerk of Court is directed to update Plaintiff's address as it is listed on his request for a status report. The Clerk of Court shall also serve Plaintiff with the orders that he has not received.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20100707

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.