Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Wells Fargo Bank v. Shree Balaji Hospitality

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (FRESNO DIVISION)


July 13, 2010

WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST BY CONSOLIDATION TO PLACER SIERRA BANK, PLAINTIFF
v.
SHREE BALAJI HOSPITALITY, LP, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP; BALWANTSINH DOLATSINH THAKOR, AN INDIVIDUAL; LABATEN BALWANTSINH THAKOR, AN INDIVIDUAL; EDF RESOURCE CAPITAL, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION; U.S. SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION, A GOVERNMENT ENTITY; CITY OF OAKDALE, A GOVERNMENT ENTITY; AND DOES 1 THROUGH 50, INCLUSIVE, DEFENDANTS

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Dennis L. Beck United States Magistrate Judge

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR EDF RESOURCE CAPITAL, INC. TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT; ORDER 22916 CASE NO. 1:10-cv-1150

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT; ORDER.

Defendant EDF REsource Capital, Inc. ("REsource"), and Plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank, National Association ("Plaintiff"), by and through their respective counsel, stipulate to extend the time for REsource to respond to the Complaint which was removed to the United States District Court on June 24, 2010, (Docket No. 1) as follows:

1. Plaintiff filed a Complaint in Stanislaus County Superior Court seeking, among other things, to foreclose the interest in certain real property held by the United States of America, Small Business Administration.

2. Plaintiff caused the Complaint to be served upon REsource on June 15, 2010, and the United States removed the case to United States District Court on June 24, 2010. Under Rule 81(c)(2)(C) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the United States is required to file a response to the complaint within 7 days after the notice of removal is filed or 21 days after service of the initial pleading.

3. A scheduling conference has been set for September 21, 2010.

4. REsource's counsel is currently in the process of reviewing records and preparing a response.

Based upon the above, the parties stipulate that REsource's time to respond to the Complaint shall be extended up to and including August 16, 2010. The parties request the Court endorse this stipulation by way of formal order.

Respectfully submitted,

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED that REsource's time to respond to the Complaint is extended to August 16, 2010.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20100713

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.