Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Fontenot v. Walker

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


July 13, 2010

HUBERT LEE FONTENOT, PETITIONER,
v.
JAMES WALKER, RESPONDENT.

ORDER

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner has consented to the jurisdiction of the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge to conduct all proceedings and enter judgment in this case pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c). On June 16, 2009, an "order re consent" was served on respondent, and respondent was directed to complete and return the form to the court within thirty days. Respondent has failed to comply with this order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, within thirty days from the filed date of this order, respondent shall either complete and return the consent form to the court or show cause why sanctions should not imposed for respondent's failure to respond to the June 16, 2009 order.

20100713

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.