Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Hamilton v. Fister

July 14, 2010

WALTER HAMILTON, DERIVATIVELY ON BEHALF OF NOMINAL DEFENDANT CADENCE DESIGN SYSTEMS, INC., PLAINTIFFS,
v.
MICHAEL J. FISTER, WILLIAM PORTER, JAMES S. MILLER, JR., KEVIN BUSHBY, R.L. SMITH MCKEITHEN, LIP-BU TAN, ALBERTO SANGIOVANNI-VINCENTELLI, JOHN B. SHOVEN, DONALD L. LUCAS, GEORGE M. SCALISE, ROGER S. SIBONI, JOHN A.C. SWAINSON, AND KPMG LLP INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS, AND CADENCE DESIGN SYSTEMS, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION, NOMINAL DEFENDANT.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: The Honorable Jeremy Fogel United States District Court Judge

STIPULATION CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

STIPULATION

Plaintiff Walter Hamilton ("Hamilton"), defendants Kevin Bushby, Michael J. Fister, Donald L. Lucas, R. L. Smith McKeithen, James S. Miller, Jr., William Porter, Alberto Sangiovanni-Vincentelli, George M. Scalise, John B. Shoven, Roger S. Siboni, John A.C. Swainson, Lip-Bu Tan and nominal defendant Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (collectively, the "Defendants"), by and through their respective counsel, stipulate as follows:

WHEREAS, Hamilton served the Verified Shareholder Derivative Complaint for Breach of Fiduciary Duty, Waste of Corporate Assets, Professional Negligence, Breach of Contract, and Unjust Enrichment (the "Complaint") on all the Defendants;

WHEREAS, Defendants currently are required to answer, move, or otherwise

WHEREAS, the initial Case Management Conference in this case is scheduled to respond to the Complaint by August 16, 2010;

WHEREAS, the parties believe that meet and confer discussions among counsel, proceed on July 16, 2010, at 10:30 a.m., before U.S. District Judge Jeremy Fogel; and the initial Case Management Conference with the Court, will be more meaningful and productive if the Case Management Conference is delayed until after the filing of Defendants' answers or responses to the Complaint;

WHEREAS, the parties agree that it would be best to extend the date of the Case Management Conference by 60 days;

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND REQUESTED, by and among the parties, acting through their respective attorneys of record, on the basis of the foregoing, that:

1. The Court continue the Case Management Conference from July 16, 2010 to September 16, 2010, or as soon thereafter as the Court's calendar permits.

DATED: July 12, 2010

THE WEISER LAW FIRM, P.C. Kathleen A. Herkenhoff Attorneys for Plaintiff Walter Hamilton

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP Ethan D. Dettmer Attorneys for Nominal Defendant Cadence Design Systems, Inc.

SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER & FLOM LLP Garrett J. Waltzer Attorneys for Defendants Michael J. Fister, Donald L. Lucas, Alberto Sangiovanni-Vincentelli, George M. Scalise, John B. Shoven, ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.