JUDGMENT AND PROBATION/COMMITMENT ORDER
In the presence of the attorney for the government, the defendant appeared in person on this date. 07/19/2010
X WITH COUNSEL Roman Darmer, Apptd.
X GUILTY, and the court being satisfied that there is a factual basis for the plea. NOLO
There being a finding/verdict of GUILTY, defendant has been convicted as charged of the offense(s) of: Conspiracy To Distribute And Possess With Intent To Distribute Cocaine Base In The Form Of Crack Cocaine, Methamphetamine, Heroin, Powder Cocaine, And Marijuana in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846, 841(a)(1), 841(b)(1)(A) as charged in Count 1 of the First Superseding Indictment.
The Court asked whether there was any reason why judgment should not be pronounced. Because no sufficient cause to the contrary was shown, or appeared to the Court, the Court adjudged the defendant guilty as charged and convicted and ordered that:
The defendant shall pay to the United States a special assessment of $100, which is due immediately.
All fines are waived as it is found that the defendant does not have the ability to pay.
Pursuant to the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984, it is the judgment of the Court that the defendant, Olga Lidia Flores, is hereby committed on Count 1 of the First Superseding Indictment to the custody of the Bureau of Prisons to be imprisoned for a term of 60 months.
Upon release from imprisonment, the defendant shall be placed on supervised release for a term of five (5) years under the following terms and conditions:
The defendant shall comply with the rules and regulations of the U. S. Probation Office and General Order 318;
During the period of community supervision, the defendant shall pay the special assessment in accordance with this judgment's orders pertaining to such payment; and The defendant shall cooperate in the collection of a DNA sample from her person.
The drug testing condition mandated by statute is suspended based on the Court's determination that the defendant poses a low risk of future substance abuse.
The Court recommends that the defendant be housed in a Southern California institution to facilitate visitation with family, friends and loved ones.
Defendant advised of her right to appeal.
On government's motion, all remaining counts dismissed.
The Court finds the defendant is forfeiting the money specifically referenced in the amended preliminary order of forfeiture previously ordered by this Court.
In addition to the special conditions of supervision imposed above, it is hereby ordered that the Standard Conditions of Probation and Supervised Release within this judgment be imposed. The Court may change the conditions of supervision, reduce or extend the period of supervision, and at any time during the supervision period or within the maximum period permitted by law, ...