Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Lopez v. Schwarzenegger

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


July 19, 2010

ANDREW RICK LOPEZ, PLAINTIFF,
v.
ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Gregory G. Hollows United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER

By order filed on July 2, 2010, plaintiff was granted an extension of time of twenty-eight days to file an amended complaint. On July 9, 2010, in a note directed to the court clerk, plaintiff enclosed the form the clerk's office had apparently sent to him, returning his amended complaint because plaintiff had failed to provide a case number. In the note, plaintiff indicates that, on July 1, 2010, he separately returned the amended complaint to the court, after he had applied the case number to it. However, although plaintiff's apparently subsequently mailed note with the clerk's notice has been filed, there is no indication in the docket of the return of the amended complaint. Plaintiff is cautioned that he has only until July 30, 2010, to file an amended complaint. As plaintiff was previously informed, there will be no further extension of time.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20100719

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.