Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Hillblom v. County of Fresno

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA FRESNO DIVISION


August 2, 2010

TERRY HILLBLOM, SANDRA HILLBLOM, AND MICHAEL L., A MINOR, BY AND AND THROUGH HIS GUARDIANS AD LITEM, TERRY AND SANDRA HILLBLOM, PLAINTIFFS,
v.
COUNTY OF FRESNO; FORMER FRESNO COUNTY SHERIFF RICHARD PIERCE; FRESNO COUNTY DEPUTY SHERIFF ROBERT CAREY; FRESNO COUNTY SHERIFF'S SERGEANTS KATHY CARREIRO AND E. BROUGHTON; AND DOES 1 THROUGH 50. DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Sandra M. Snyder United States Magistrate Judge

STIPULATION AND MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE) ORDER DATE: J ULY 20, 2010 TIME: 2:30 p.m. DEPT: 7

The parties hereby stipulate to and request an Order on Defendants' Motion for a Protective Order, as follows:

Plaintiffs will take the following depositions:

1. Lt. Mark Padilla, as defendants' PMK regarding Fresno County Sheriff's Department supervisory practices, internal affairs investigations and management systems.

2. Lt. Richard Ko, as defendants' PMK regarding Fresno County Sheriff's Department training and certification.

3. Hanford Police Chief Carlos Mestas, as a percipient witness and as defendants' PMK regarding Fresno County Sheriff's Department background investigations and hiring.

4. Rod Craig

5. Sgt. Greg Gularte

6.Richard Pierce

7. Kathy Carreiro

8. Eric Broughton

9. Robert Carey

Plaintiffs agree to request but not require document production in their notices for these depositions.

The parties agree, and request an Order permitting, extension of the non-expert witness discovery cutoff date through and until September 5, 2010, in light of travel plans and medical issues related to two witnesses, which may not permit the taking of their depositions until early September. The parties do not request a change in the existing trial, pretrial and dispositive motions dates as set forth in the current Scheduling Order.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Dated: July 23, 2010

PATIENCE MILROD Attorney for Plaintiffs

JAMES J. ARENDT Attorney for Defendants

ORDER ON STIPULATION

Having reviewed the Defendants' moving papers, and the parties' discovery dispute summaries, and having conducted a telephonic hearing on July 20, 2010 at 2:30 p.m. at which defense and plaintiffs' counsel presented their positions and arguments, and finding the parties have been reasonably diligent in their efforts to complete discovery, and othergood cause appearing therefor,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the non-expert discovery cutoff date be and is hereby extended to September 5, 2010, and that the existing trial, pretrial and dispositive motions dates as set forth in the current Scheduling Order remain FIRM.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiffs may take the following depositions:

1. Lt. Mark Padilla, as defendants' PMK regarding Fresno County Sheriff's Department supervisory practices, internal affairs investigations and management systems.

2. Lt. Richard Ko, as defendants' PMK regarding Fresno County Sheriff's Department training and certification.

3. Hanford Police Chief Carlos Mestas, as a percipient witness and as Stipulation and [Proposed] Order re: Motion for Protective Order defendants' PMK regarding Fresno County Sheriff's Department background investigations and hiring.

4. Rod Craig

5. Sgt. Greg Gularte

6. Richard Pierce

7. Kathy Carreiro

8. Eric Broughton

9. Robert Carey

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiffs may request but not require production of documents in connection with these depositions.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20100802

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.