Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Bennett v. Smithkline Beecham Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA -- FRESNO DIVISION


August 2, 2010

TODD BENNETT, PLAINTIFF,
v.
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION, DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Sheila K. Oberto United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER ON STIPULATION TO EXTEND DISCOVERY AND MOTION DEADLINES

(Docket No. 28)

On July 30, 2010, the parties filed a stipulation requesting that the Court modify the existing scheduling order in this matter. The parties request the following modifications:

Initial Deadline Requested Extension Non-Expert Discovery August 20, 2010 September 24, 2010 Plaintiff's Expert Disclosure September 10, 2010 October 8, 2010 Depose Plaintiff's Expert Witness October 22, 2010 November 12, 2010 Conduct IME of Plaintiff October 29, 2010 November 19, 2010 Defendant's Expert Disclosure November 19, 2010 December 10, 2010

The parties agree that all other deadlines set forth in the November 12, 2009, scheduling order are to remain unchanged.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the parties' stipulated request for an extension of discovery deadlines as set forth above is GRANTED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20100802

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.