UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
August 2, 2010
SHASHI KHANNA, SUING INDIVIDUALLY AND AS SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST OF AMANKUMAR KHANNA, DECEASED, BY AND ON BEHALF OF AMANKUMAR KHANNA, ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, AND THE GENERAL PUBLIC, PLAINTIFFS,
INTER-CON SECURITY SYSTEMS, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION D/B/A/ HEALTHCARE SECURITY SERVICES GROUP, A PUTATIVE INDEPENDENT ENTITY; ENRIQUE HERNANDEZ JR., AN INDIVIDUAL; NEIL MARTAU, AN INDIVIDUAL; LANCE MUELLER, AN INDIVIDUAL; ROLAND A. HERNANDEZ, AN INDIVIDUAL; PAUL R. MILLER, AN INDIVIDUAL; MICHAEL P. MACHARG, AN INDIVIDUAL; JEANNE GERVIN; AN INDIVIDUAL; JANA FANNING, AN INDIVIDUAL; BRITTANY MOORE, AN INDIVIDUAL; CATHERINE ROSS, AN INDIVIDUAL; LINDA SAYAD, AN INDIVIDUAL; MARK CHAMBERLAIN, AN INDIVIDUAL; AND JAMES LATHAM, AN INDIVIDUAL, DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Garland E. Burrell, Jr. United States District Judge
ORDER GRANTING PRIYANKA KHANNA'S MOTION TO SUBSTITUTE*fn1
On July 1, 2010, Priyanka Khanna moved under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 25(a)(1) to be substituted as a plaintiff in this case in the place of Shashi Khanna, who died on May 4, 2010, during the pendency of this action. (Docket No. 39.) Priyanka Khanna declares that she is Shashi Khanna's natural daughter and successor in interest as defined in section 377.11 of the California Code of Civil Procedure and succeeds to her interest in this proceeding. (Khanna Decl. ¶ 15- 16.) Defendants filed a statement of non-opposition, in which they state that they "do not intend to oppose" Priyanka Khanna's motion.
(Statement of Non-Opposition 1:8.) Therefore, Priyanka Khanna's motion to substitute is GRANTED.